W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2009

Re: HTML5-warnings - request to publish as next heartbeat WD

From: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:37:49 +0200
Message-ID: <4A7F4FBD.3050302@malform.no>
To: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
CC: 'Maciej Stachowiak' <mjs@apple.com>, 'Manu Sporny' <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, 'HTMLWG WG' <public-html@w3.org>
[ deleted cc to whatwg to make Ian happy ]

John Foliot On 09-08-09 23.59:

> Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>
>> If we indeed have a draft, then I'd like to have the option to vote
>> yes or no on either draft independently, instead of either-or. For
>> example, some people may wish to vote for both, and I would like to
>> have that opportunity, though I would probably only exercise it if
>> Manu's draft is changed. Sam's call for multiple drafts was based on
>> the premise that they would be published independently, not that we'd
>> have either-or votes.
> 
> I agree.  At this time there is no harm in having 2 efforts being
> recognized as serious proposals, and in fact that may be a good thing.
> "Say that you can do X, Y or Z" instead of "Don't do X"...

+1

>> If you limit your list to open issues that have been unresolved for at
>> least 6 months without meaningful progress (with reference to an issue
>> tracker issue, or a mailing list post, dating back at least 6 months)
>> and if you remove the other (seemingly unintended) technical
>> differences from Ian's draft (such as adding back the Database
>> section), then I will support publication of your draft in addition to
>> Ian's.
> 
> +1   Sharing the load is a Good Thing (tm)


+1
-- 
leif halvard silli
Received on Sunday, 9 August 2009 22:38:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 10 October 2014 16:24:50 UTC