W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2009

Re: Normative warnings (was: Re: ACTION-128: Draft @summary voting text in conjunction with PF)

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 12:36:19 +0300
Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, WAI XTech <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Message-Id: <45A6358C-691F-4220-AD25-6C79B01C3B19@iki.fi>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
On Jul 29, 2009, at 03:45, Ian Hickson wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Henri Sivonen wrote:
>> On Jul 8, 2009, at 11:26, Ian Hickson wrote:
>>> For example, a validator could report some pages as "Valid HTML5"  
>>> and
>>> others as "Valid HTML5 with warnings".
>> I thought we agreed that we don't want multiple conformance classes.
> Multiple conformance classes is exactly what this is. I don't think  
> it's a
> good idea, but it's what we have, if we require warnings, whether we  
> say
> so or not.

At least for the time being, I've made normative warnings identical to  
discretionary warnings as far as UI and validation outcome summary goes.

Henri Sivonen
Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2009 09:37:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:49 UTC