W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2009

Re: close ISSUE-20 (table-headers) without more testing? wa: Input on the agenda

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 15:42:10 +0200
To: "James Graham" <jgraham@opera.com>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.usx20kk9wxe0ny@widsith.local>
On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:04:03 +0200, James Graham <jgraham@opera.com> wrote:

> Dan Connolly wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 09:56 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>> Ian Hickson wrote:
>> [...]
>>>> ISSUE-20 (table-headers): Improvements to the table-headers algorithm  
>>>> in the HTML 5 spec
>>> Michael(tm) Smith ensured that Ian Hickson follows up... last year
>>>
>>> I suggested that this item be closed given that we have not received  
>>> any feedback, but DanC objected.
>>  Let's see... that was
>>   http://www.w3.org/2009/02/26-html-wg-minutes.html#item01
>>  Perhaps I advised against closing it during the discussion...
>> ("objected" suggests you put a question and I formally objected...)
>
> FIW my recollection of the email discussion is that the only reason not  
> to close this issue was the lack of testcases.

Yeah, and I agreed to make some more :(

I doubt I have time to do that soon, but if people nag me I might make one  
every so often...

cheers

-- 
Charles McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals       Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Saturday, 25 April 2009 13:43:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:34 GMT