W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2009

Re: feedback on The pattern attribute

From: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:00:22 +0100
Message-ID: <55687cf80904151300i1eb19ce5uee7c1bcaa5b92fdd@mail.gmail.com>
To: jgraham@opera.com
Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>

i suggest providing the information in text, as content of the input's
associated label element.

 >But it is not obvious that solution is better than the one in the
> spec.
why is it not obvious that an authoring practice that involves no
implementation changes and ensures the information is available to all
by default, is not a better solution?


2009/4/15  <jgraham@opera.com>:
> Quoting Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>:
>> Anne wrote:
>>> Isn't the idea of new features that implementations have to change as
>>> well?
>> It is not a question of the implementations changing, the question is,
>> has this author conformance requirement been thought out in terms of
>> what is the best way for AT to provide this information, I don't think
>> it has.
> So given that there is a need for authors to provide hints on the allowed
> values of form controls and that it must be both available to those who use
> AT and those who do not, what would you suggest as a better solution for
> providing a hint as to the allowed values of the input element? It seems
> like the "simplest thing that could possibly work" solution is to provide no
> guidance here and assume that authors will place the relevant hints in the
> main content of the page and in the region of the control (maybe even in the
> label). But it is not obvious that solution is better than the one in the
> spec.

with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG Europe
Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium

www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org
Web Accessibility Toolbar -
Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2009 20:01:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:44 UTC