W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2008

Re: Subdocument fragments in a compound document (part of detailed review of documents and document framegents)

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 10:56:12 +0000 (UTC)
To: Jim Jewett <jimjjewett@gmail.com>
Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, foolistbar@googlemail.com
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0805131055540.22257@hixie.dreamhostps.com>

On Sun, 11 May 2008, Jim Jewett wrote:

> >> Currently the only element allowed "wherever a subdocument fragment 
> >> is allowed in a compound document" is the html element. RFC4287 
> >> mandates that within an Atom document, for an XHTML text construct, 
> >> it must have a single div element as the content.
> 
> > Given that Atom or another spec could as easily have allowed any flow 
> > content, or ... My intention wasn't to disallow ... My intention was 
> > just to allow <html> to be used in other vocabularies where those 
> > vocabularies just specified a generic inclusion point.
> 
> Why not just say so explicitly?  For example, just after: [...]

Hmm, good idea. Added an example.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 10:56:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:17 GMT