Steven Faulkner wrote: > i am not going to bother responding to the the rest of your inflamatory guff. I would actually rather like to see a response to this: >> So wait. Do you actually understand the logic behind WCAG 2.0 on this or >> other points? If so, then refusing the explain the logic seems like a >> needless lack of collegiality. If not, does that mean you have just taken >> WCAG 2.0 on faith and applied it without understanding the underlying logic? >> If that is the case, then I do not understand how your proposal can be >> meaningfully discussed. I feel that it would help me, as an implementor, to understand the reasons for the WCAG 2.0 decisions, not just read the final product... -BorisReceived on Monday, 12 May 2008 19:33:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:11 GMT