W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2008

Re: X(HT)ML Fragment Identifiers

From: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:08:47 -0700
Message-ID: <4851D6AF.1050701@berkeley.edu>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
CC: Robert J Burns <rob@robburns.com>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org

one last time...

Ian Hickson wrote:
> As far as Bugzilla goes, if we make it the group's issue-tracking 
> mechanism I would be happy to give any issue that ends up on this list:
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?product=HTML+WG&bug_status=NEW                                        
> ...the same level of response that I give any e-mail sent to the WHATWG 
> list; that is, given full consideration and given an explicit response. 

i am proud to report that i am currently the only one on that list! 
which of course makes me kind of suspicious about the issue handling 
process. unless i hear otherwise, i will assume that being on that list 
is good enough to have "officially raised the issue".

on the other hand, i have to admit that i (casually) used bugzilla in 
other W3C activities, and while it kind of worked ok, it definitely is 
not pretty and could use a little streamlining just to be a little less 
awkward and cumbersome. if, for example, there would be an easy way to 
just hide all the fields which are totally useless for specification 
purposes, this would already clean up the interface substantially and 
maybe make more people willing to use bugzilla.

cheers,

dret.
Received on Friday, 13 June 2008 02:09:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:55 UTC