W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2008

Re: Marking Up Poetry (Was: Conformance of DL Groups Missing DT or DD)

From: Lee Kowalkowski <lee.kowalkowski@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:16:12 +0000
Message-ID: <610592c90802280116w2c0b14ffn818a96250e70611@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-html@w3.org

On 27/02/2008, Smylers <Smylers@stripey.com> wrote:
>
> Dr. Olaf Hoffmann writes:
> > Why it is, is already detailled in the wiki:
> > http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/PoeticSemantics
>
> Please could you explain that?  I saw that page mentions that <dl> can
> be abused for this, but it doesn't read to me as an explanation as to
> why it's the best.

I don't understand it either.  If you have a list of entirely of terms
or a list entirely of descriptions, it doesn't mean you have a list of
definitions.  You just have an (un)ordered list.

-- 
Lee
Received on Thursday, 28 February 2008 09:16:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:12 GMT