W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2008

Re: Are new void elements really a good idea?

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 13:30:18 +0200
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.ugq0wsn364w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 13:22:14 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>  
wrote:
> On the other hand, what, except ideological reasons, stops us from  
> allowing
>
>   <tagname></tagname>
>
> as well?

<br></br> "means" <br><br> due to legacy parsing.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Sunday, 31 August 2008 11:30:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:22 GMT