Re: Acessibility of <audio> and <video>

James Graham wrote:
> You mean something like
> <video>
> <source>
> <source>
> <object></object>
> </video>

Precisely.

> I think that doesn't work as the spec is written at the moment. It seems 
> like it would be useful for transitioning to <video> in a situation 
> where the number of transcodings of the original is smaller than the 
> subset of all browser-supported encodings but an applet/plugin 
> basedlayer for one transcoding is available.

Indeed.  That's precisely the situation we're in with Theora, H.264, and 
Flash right now, as far as I can tell.

-Boris