- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 14:50:56 +0900
- To: "Justin James" <j_james@mindspring.com>
- Cc: "'Ian Hickson'" <ian@hixie.ch>, "'HTML WG'" <public-html@w3.org>
Le 6 août 2008 à 14:32, Justin James a écrit : > So yeah, I'd like it if we could have > some sort of "HTML add-on" items that we could release in a > finalized form > on a regular basis, and get stuff like Web workers, <audio>, > <video>, etc. > in it so people can be working with a finalized spec that we promise > we've > really audited and plan on not changing before the full HTML 5 spec > gets > finalized, instead of them basically guessing what hopefully won't > change > and implementing and authoring against that. > > I also recognize that this is 99.99% not going to happen for a great > number > of reasons, our charter and expected deliverables, for one thing. :) Not necessary completely silly. I'm not talking for the chairs nor W3C here. Consider it a personal opinion. But you can perfectly imagine that the HTML WG publishes a specification (which is consistent and tested) with the things already really implemented in let say "Internet Explorer, Mozilla, Opera, Safari". The rest could be put either in an appendix or a W3C WG Note reserving them for future works and publications. -- Karl Dubost - W3C http://www.w3.org/QA/ Be Strict To Be Cool
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2008 05:51:36 UTC