XHTML 5 in my opinion could never work merley for the fact that the XHTML group will be out in the cold in a good many years when version 5 rolls around.... as Adam suggested HTXML could work, or perhaps HTML-XML. Regardless Shakespeare comes to mind mind with the famous line "A rose by any other name would smell as sweet." I believe that we should not spend so much time worrying about the name that the implementation suffers. On 9/28/07, Adam Nash <adamn@wirespring.com> wrote: > > > On Friday 28 September 2007 12:06 pm, Dean Edridge wrote: > > Is it possible to have an update on this please? Can we call the XML > > serialisation of the spec XHTML 5 or not? > > Have we considered "HTXML 5" for the XML serialization? > > -- Chris@tuesdaybegins.com http://www.tuesdaybegins.comReceived on Saturday, 29 September 2007 00:05:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:01 GMT