- From: Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:12:14 -0500
- To: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
Hi Jens, On Sep 17, 2007, at 8:55 AM, Jens Meiert wrote: > >>> As far as I also understand recent feedback on that matter, we >>> certainly don't make a mistake by reconsidering the names and >>> probably even modify the semantics of “header”, “footer”, and >>> “aside”. (Probably flanked by a quick survey?) > > Is it legitimate to create a wiki page related to the “aside”, > “header”, and “footer” discussion? Yes, I think that would definitely be worth having on the wiki. Right now there are three starter pages for those elements [1]. It might be worth adding a new page that interlinks with those pages to discuss the issues raised in this thread. This would include metadata issues, presentational issues, etc. Take care, Rob [1]: <http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/AddedElementAside> <http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/AddedElementFooter> <http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/AddedElementHeader>
Received on Monday, 17 September 2007 14:12:34 UTC