W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2007

Re: Proposal for developing HTML 5 materials for Web *authors*

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:17:16 +0900
Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "public-html@w3.org Tracking WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-Id: <E31B8FFE-5F3F-48B0-B1E1-787D43340304@w3.org>
To: Dean Edridge <dean@55.co.nz>


Le 29 nov. 2007 à 14:42, Dean Edridge a écrit :
> The http://www.google.com/ main page is not a very big file.  
> Changing it to a more interoperable/universal syntax would not make  
> it that much larger and would not be the end of the world. Other  
> Websites do not have problems conforming to a stricter standard.

Plus the fact that valid doesn't mean bigger. :) but that's unrelated.  
The initial argument of Ian was moot.

   Anyhow, the result is a valid HTML 4.01
   Strict file that is 3 902 bytes large.
   Google’s invalid kinda-HTML 2.something
   very-loose is 4 944 bytes. The valid and
   strict version is 1 042 bytes smaller.
   That’s 21 percent savings on bandwidth costs.

http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200608/google_valid_and_strict/


--
Karl Dubost - W3C
http://www.w3.org/QA/
Be Strict To Be Cool
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2007 07:17:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:51 UTC