These questions are relevant not only to the headers debate, but also to the 'Moving forward' thread regarding reaching consensus and design principles/reviewing questions. Ben Boyle wrote [1]: > There seem enough cases here to warrant it's continued part in HTML. Anne van Kesteren wrote [2]: > The arguments for removing it are that the feature isn't widely used Thomas Broyer wrote [3]: > it has been proven that: headers= isn't used that much in the wild I asked about quantity of cases before [4] and didn't get a response. But I'll ask again. What is number of cases that proves a feature should be included or excluded from the spec? Also how is that number derived? What factors are taken into consideration? Thanks, Laura [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007May/1262.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007May/1249.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007May/1259.html [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007May/1144.htmlReceived on Thursday, 31 May 2007 17:41:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:32:05 GMT