W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Complex Table Examples

From: Thomas Broyer <t.broyer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 15:41:20 +0200
Message-ID: <a9699fd20705230641i79f96425lf2c8fdfd68ec3260@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-html@w3.org
2007/5/23, Laura Carlson:
>
> Another id/header example "in the wild":
>
> -- Michael Leikam <mleikam@csulb.edu> wrote:
>
> > here is one place where I'm using two complex tables with
> > id/headers:
> http://daf.csulb.edu/printshop/copying.html

The only thing that cannot be expressed with scope="" is that, e.g.,
"20# Bond White" is a "Paper" and "8.5 x 11 3HP" is a "Size"; because
the algorithm proposed for HTML5 only associates data-cells with
header-cells, not header-cells with other header-cells (and "20# Bond
White" and "8.5 x 11 3HP" are scope="row" header-cells, aren't they?).
Please note I'm not saying such a difference is not important, I'm
just pointing out this is the *only* difference (in this case).
Actually, in HTML4, you should make the cells of the first two columns
TDs (because they act as both data-cells –given that they themselves
are associated header-cells from the first row– and header-cells for
the other data-cells from the same rows): HTML4 DTD says "TH is for
headers, TD for data, but for cells acting as both use TD", and
headers="" and scope="" are expressed in terms of "header cells" and
"data cells", i.e. THs and TDs respectively.

Apart from that, header-cells that would be associated with data-cells
would be *exactly* the same (using scope="row" and scope="column"
appropriately, namely in the second column in both tables and in the
second row in the second table).

-- 
Thomas Broyer
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2007 13:41:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:44 UTC