- From: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 12:11:21 -0400
- To: HTML Working Group <public-html@w3.org>
- Cc: "Philip Taylor (Webmaster)" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>,
At 04:09 PM 5/17/2007 +0200, Dão Gottwald wrote: >Philip Taylor (Webmaster) schrieb: >>Dão Gottwald wrote: >>> >>>The discussion is about defining semantics for certain classes, which is >>>utterly unrelated to default style sheets. >>How /can/ it be "utterly unrelated" ? > >It was never proposed to specify default styles for those classes. I think that you are mistaken. But just in case you are correct -- that there has never been an email that explicitly argues for assigning styles for CLASSes -- then please consider this such a proposal. However, I think that everyone understood the intention to use CLASS names as semantic tokens and as CSS selectors. Besides, since a CLASS value relates an element to a CSS style, and also relates an element to an out-of-band semantic, then it seems clear that the CSS style sheet is related to an out-of-band semantic through their common relationship to a CLASS name.
Received on Thursday, 17 May 2007 16:22:29 UTC