W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Formal Objection to Questions 1 and 2; Abstention on Question 3

From: Philip & Le Khanh <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>
Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 11:06:08 +0100
Message-ID: <463DA890.7060703@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>
To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, W3C HTML Mailing List <www-html@w3.org>



Anne van Kesteren wrote:

> FWIW, the deliverables section our charter 
> http://www.w3.org/2007/03/HTML-WG-charter.html#deliverables does mention:
> 
>   "A serialized form of such a language using a defined,
>   non-XML syntax compatible with the 'classic HTML'
>   parsers of existing Web browsers."
> 
> which sort of addresses that point I think. (Which actually also 
> addresses all the debate about draconian versus non-draconian handling 
> come to think of it...)

But it uses this phrase in the context of deliverables that
are "in scope", rather than mandated, if my understanding
of the charter is correct.

Philip Taylor
Received on Sunday, 6 May 2007 10:06:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:44 UTC