W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Proposed list of predefined class names

From: Rene Saarsoo <nene@triin.net>
Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 16:45:17 +0300
To: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.truwhrmoexn25i@localhost>

Jonas Sicking wrote:
> You could certainly give them semantic meaning by doing the above. But  
> you could do that even if the list wasn't in the spec. The thing is that  
> they are no more or less likely to have the semantic meaning that you  
> think it did than if we said "here are some class names people seem to  
> use a lot, treat them like they have semantic meaning based on their  
> name".
> Basically what we are doing is that we are guessing that most people  
> that currently use class=error in their pages are using it to indicate  
> an error message. But anyone could make that guess.

Alright, I think I misunderstood you at first place. I thought
you were against marking up warnings, copyrights and other
units per se. But it looks you are actually against using class
names for that purpose - in that case, I'm in agreement with you.

Rene Saarsoo
Received on Saturday, 5 May 2007 13:44:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:20 UTC