- From: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 14:44:30 -0700
- To: Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- CC: Gareth Hay <gazhay@gmail.com>, James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk>, "matt@builtfromsource.com" <matt@builtfromsource.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Jeff Schiller [mailto:codedread@gmail.com] wrote: >Though I wonder, if a UA mistakenly implements proposed error handling >in WHATWG's HTML5 and content starts depending on it, isn't that >roughly the same problem? You're still going to have a UA improperly >implementing a spec, content depending on it, and other UAs motivated >to emulate this incorrect behavior. Or, more to my point, what happens when you don't specify some error-handling rule in the spec because you don't think of it, and due to different architectures multiple vendors do different things and ship them without realizing it.
Received on Friday, 4 May 2007 21:44:35 UTC