- From: aurelien levy <aurelien.levy@free.fr>
- Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 18:58:16 +0200
- To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
> > I'm very curious to know in which ways the above table is more usable > for people with AT than the following table: > > > <table> > <caption>Travelling expenses report</caption> > <tr><th>Destination<th>Traveling > dates<th>Meal<th>Hotel<th>Transport<th>Total > <tr><td rowspan="3">Atlanta<td>August 25th<td>37<td>112<td>45<td> > <tr><td>August 26th<td>27<td>112<td>45<td> > <tr><td>Sub-total<td>64<td>224<td>90<td>378 > <tr><td rowspan="3">Boston<td>August 27th<td>96<td>109<td>36<td> > <tr><td>August 28th<td>35<td>109<td>36<td> > <tr><td>Sub-total<td>131<td>218<td>72<td>421 > <tr><td>Compilation<td>Grand total<td>195<td>442<td>162<td>799 > </table> > > > What features does the first table provide that this one doesn't? > (This is a serious question.) > > If you insist that the first and the second column should be table > headers, then the current design with scope="" allows for that too, > AFAICT, but I could be mistaken. > hi, the problem is not on the use of scope instead of headers/id, it's that at this time headers/id have a better support in the assistive technology so it's very important to keep them in html 5 and the summary attribut to. Aurélien
Received on Friday, 4 May 2007 17:01:43 UTC