- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 11:40:49 -0500
- To: "Philip Taylor (Webmaster)" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 17:24 +0100, Philip Taylor (Webmaster) wrote: > Thank you for the clarification, Dan : > > Dan Connolly wrote: > > > (b) I expect the first release of the HTML 5 spec > > after a review by this WG over the course of this > > month (see > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Jun/0282.html ) > > but I don't expect that release to address many of the > > issues that come up during that review. Addressing those > > issues is likely to take 6 months or more, and it's not > > reasonable to wait that long before a first release. > > > > (c) I encourage work on design principles meanwhile; > > Would you not agree that we cannot meaningfully review > the HTML 5 draft specification until we have agreed the > design principles ? I think review such as... "This is part of my detailed review the parsing algorithm. ..." -- http://www.w3.org/mid/0CE5DE0B-269A-493D-ACE8-FC337EBFBFF7@iki.fi is quite meaningful and need not wait until we have agreed on design principles. Concurrent iteration is a bit chaotic, but a strict waterfall approach seems like a poor use of available resources. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2007 16:55:12 UTC