W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2007

Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki

From: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 13:34:45 +0100
Message-ID: <55687cf80707010534q65111264q3639ee41d7294093@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Roger Johansson" <roger@456bereastreet.com>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>

>How realstic is it to expect people to provide alternate content for their
>Flash content?

an example "in the wild": image maps provided as alternate content for flash
http://sites.target.com/site/en/corporate/page.jsp?contentId=PRD03-001811



On 01/07/07, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 11:55:26 +0200, Roger Johansson
> <roger@456bereastreet.com> wrote:
> >> Ideally, video would be made accessible by itself.
> >
> > Yes, but how realistic is that?
>
> How realstic is it to expect people to provide alternate content for their
> Flash content?
>
>
> --
> Anne van Kesteren
> <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
> <http://www.opera.com/>
>
>


--
with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG Europe
Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium

www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org


-- 
with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG Europe
Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium

www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org
Received on Sunday, 1 July 2007 12:34:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:02 GMT