W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January to March 2007

Re: Deprecate <accronym> (was: Brainstorming - abbreviations)

From: Noah Slater <nslater@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 00:21:37 +0000
Message-ID: <9ea1c1180703241721i19928667v1266dd40b97132f6@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Rimantas Liubertas" <rimantas@gmail.com>
Cc: public-html@w3.org

> <...> Two elements aren't needed. The semantic distinctions between abbr and
> > acronym are murky at best.

Incorrect.

The differences are very distinct.

> <...> These elements are really only useful to super-conscientious authors who
> > are trying to be helpful to their readers. There is absolutely no need
> > whatever to distinguish between acronyms and abbreviations for these uses.

Incorrect.

Acronyms, initialisms. and abbreviations all need to be spoken differently.


> > So why kill acronym and not abbr? Semantically, abbreviation is the
> > broader category. Not every acronym is an abbreviation.

Incorrect.

All acronyms are abbreviations.

People keep forgetting initialisms. There is an important difference.

Noah

-- 
"Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so
far as society is free to use the results." - R. Stallman
Received on Sunday, 25 March 2007 13:33:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 25 March 2007 13:34:04 GMT