ryan wrote: > On Dec 19, 2007, at 6:27 AM, Dean Edridge wrote: >> Have you not heard of "one web" ? >> A XHTML5 web page MUST be accessible to all devices, otherwise how >> can it be used? > > Perhaps you should just use HTML5 instead? Oh I see. So now you're deciding that XHTML5 is not needed and I best go and use another language instead? Typical attitude from your crowd. > >> Do you expect people using XHTML5 to use content-negotiation for >> ever? If so, they will never be able to use the benefits of XHTML5 >> such as embedding SVG into a document. > > SVG is on the list of things to specify in the HTML5 non-xml > serialization: > > http://www.whatwg.org/issues/ Same as above. Not your place to decide that other people don't need XHTML5. > >> A person should be able to create a web page in XHTML5 and have it >> supported by *all* user-agents. If not, the whole idea of "one web" >> gets thrown out the window. > > Why isn't support of HTML5 (non-xml) not enough to have "one web"? It's not for you to decide that I or other people don't need XHTML5 Ryan. The point of having HTML5 and XHTML5 is to give people options. Dean EdridgeReceived on Thursday, 20 December 2007 14:48:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:40:06 GMT