W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-xml@w3.org > January 2011

Re: The interpretation of script

From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:16:35 -0500
To: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
Cc: public-html-xml@w3.org
Message-ID: <1295320595.22336.946.camel@desktop.barefootcomputing.com>
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 21:34 -0500, Noah Mendelsohn wrote:
> [...]

> We are trying to determine what the specification for 
> <script> should say about processing such XML content, and whether the 
> specification for <script> should be generalized to cover its use for data 
> as well as for scripts (whether in XML or not). 

I see, thanks. I was wondering what sense it would make to have a script
element whose content you did not want to execute... better to use
<not-really-script-at-all>
or, more sensibly :-) <data>...</data>, and then it seems to me it's not
an issue?

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org
Received on Tuesday, 18 January 2011 03:16:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 18 January 2011 03:16:40 GMT