W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-xml@w3.org > January 2011

Re: Use cases

From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 12:01:23 -0500
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, public-html-xml@w3.org, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Message-ID: <20110105170123.GB1928@mercury.ccil.org>
Sam Ruby scripsit:

> To make this concrete: I'm arguing *FOR* producers of XHTML5 to use the  
> self-closing syntax when emitting br elements and not to use the  
> self-closing syntax when emitting script elements.  I've never heard a  
> satisfactory answer to the question as to why the spec is defined this  
> way,

What's wrong with "bug-for-bug compatibility", aka "When in Rome, shoot
off Roman candles" as a rationale?

Values of beeta will give rise to dom!          John Cowan
(5th/6th edition 'mv' said this if you tried    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
to rename '.' or '..' entries; see              cowan@ccil.org
Received on Wednesday, 5 January 2011 17:01:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:58:27 UTC