W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-xml@w3.org > August 2011

Editorial comments

From: timeless <timeless@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:24:00 -0400
Message-ID: <CAACrNNcQRj8-J=chW-yuy5Z5wuABPD6C8RUVYhnRaQS8D-jQyA@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-html-xml@w3.org

> Where HTML goes to great lengths to defined how


> the most successful approach is likely to involve parsing the XML with an XML parser and the HTML with an HTML parser<span class="revision-deleted"><span>, combining the resulting DOMs through some other process.</span></span></p>

This deletion removed the only period from your `sentence`.

> Also, conforming trees that have tr elements as children of table elements will be replaced with semantically equivalent but tree-wise different construct where the tr elements gain a tbody parent which is a child of the table.


> This is very much like the escaped markup case where downstream processing must be sophisticated enough to reconstruct the authors intent.


> Working out all of the details to assure that the necessary error correction produced expected results in all cases might be tedious

do you mean `produced`, `produces`, or 'produce'?

I was asked to suggest that you use a spell checker on the document as
part of the publication steps (if you feel that the TAG should
recommend that all documents include this as part of their process,
please feel free to make such a recommendation).

* "arbirary"
* "concatentation"
* "gauranteed"
* "simulataneously"

Since you reference DOM, perhaps you could add it to references. You
could also actually reference XML and HTML5 in references.
Received on Wednesday, 31 August 2011 19:24:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:58:28 UTC