W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-xml@w3.org > August 2011

Re: Suggested revised text for HTML/XML report intro

From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 14:22:24 -0400
Message-ID: <4E4AB560.2050701@arcanedomain.com>
To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
CC: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, "public-html-xml@w3.org" <public-html-xml@w3.org>, Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>

On 8/16/2011 12:32 PM, John Cowan wrote:
> The problem is that there is no compelling reason to prefer one
>  approach to any other.

I'm missing something. This seems to say: "We may be looking at two or more 
approaches either of which would be valuable to the community; since 
there's no obvious reason (yet) to pick one over the other, let's not 
advocate either."

Received on Tuesday, 16 August 2011 18:22:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:58:28 UTC