W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-testsuite@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Another large installment of html5bidi tests ready for test suite review

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:00:53 +0000
Message-ID: <4F43BFB5.1070205@w3.org>
To: "Aharon (Vladimir) Lanin" <aharon@google.com>
CC: Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>, public-html-testsuite@w3.org
See 
http://www.w3.org/blog/International/2012/02/21/additional-new-html5-bidi-tests/

I mainly reviewed the tests to ensure that they would work with the i18n 
test suite an look the same as the original html files.  I only looked 
in detail at the logic behind a few of the tests.

Cheers,
RI


Richard Ishida
Internationalization Activity Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)

http://www.w3.org/International/
http://rishida.net/

On 20/02/2012 18:44, Aharon (Vladimir) Lanin wrote:
> Thanks for the response!
>
>  > Have these test cases been reviewed within the html5bidi group? IMO,
> that would be sufficient.
>
> Richard Ishida of the W3C i18n WG has reviewed all of them, I believe,
> and is adding them to the i18n test suite. You can get more info from
> Richard.
>
> Aharon
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com
> <mailto:ms2ger@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Aharon,
>
>
>     On 02/19/2012 09:48 AM, Aharon (Vladimir) Lanin wrote:
>
>         The new tests are in htrml5bidi/dir-auto, and test the new
>         "auto" value for
>         the dir attribute.
>
>         There is also a second<br>  test,
>         html5bidi/br/br-bidi-in-__inline-ancestors.html.
>
>
>     Thank you for those submissions.
>
>
>         Has there been any progress at all on the tests we had submitted
>         earlier
>         (two months ago)?
>
>
>     I'm afraid not a lot of people understand bidi well enough to review
>     those test cases, though. Have these test cases been reviewed within
>     the html5bidi group? IMO, that would be sufficient.
>
>     HTH
>     Ms2ger
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 16:01:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 21 February 2012 16:01:25 GMT