Re: Another large installment of html5bidi tests ready for test suite review

I made sure to review all tests that I did not myself author. However, I am
not sure that the tests I wrote were all consistently reviewed. We can make
sure to do that now (retroactively) - if this is indeed sufficient to get
the tests approved.

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org> wrote:

> See http://www.w3.org/blog/**International/2012/02/21/**
> additional-new-html5-bidi-**tests/<http://www.w3.org/blog/International/2012/02/21/additional-new-html5-bidi-tests/>
>
> I mainly reviewed the tests to ensure that they would work with the i18n
> test suite an look the same as the original html files.  I only looked in
> detail at the logic behind a few of the tests.
>
> Cheers,
>
> RI
>
>
> Richard Ishida
> Internationalization Activity Lead
> W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)
>
> http://www.w3.org/**International/ <http://www.w3.org/International/>
> http://rishida.net/
>
> On 20/02/2012 18:44, Aharon (Vladimir) Lanin wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the response!
>>
>>  > Have these test cases been reviewed within the html5bidi group? IMO,
>> that would be sufficient.
>>
>> Richard Ishida of the W3C i18n WG has reviewed all of them, I believe,
>> and is adding them to the i18n test suite. You can get more info from
>> Richard.
>>
>> Aharon
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com
>> <mailto:ms2ger@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>    Hi Aharon,
>>
>>
>>    On 02/19/2012 09:48 AM, Aharon (Vladimir) Lanin wrote:
>>
>>        The new tests are in htrml5bidi/dir-auto, and test the new
>>        "auto" value for
>>        the dir attribute.
>>
>>        There is also a second<br>  test,
>>        html5bidi/br/br-bidi-in-__**inline-ancestors.html.
>>
>>
>>
>>    Thank you for those submissions.
>>
>>
>>        Has there been any progress at all on the tests we had submitted
>>        earlier
>>        (two months ago)?
>>
>>
>>    I'm afraid not a lot of people understand bidi well enough to review
>>    those test cases, though. Have these test cases been reviewed within
>>    the html5bidi group? IMO, that would be sufficient.
>>
>>    HTH
>>    Ms2ger
>>
>>
>>