W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-testsuite@w3.org > February 2011

Re: Automated Test Runner

From: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 13:28:19 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=kkOY3-yd7XjOdp68=O5-UR1aQF=MFLcVKQ55F@mail.gmail.com>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Cc: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, Kris Krueger <krisk@microsoft.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, "public-html-testsuite@w3.org" <public-html-testsuite@w3.org>, "Jonas Sicking (jonas@sicking.cc)" <jonas@sicking.cc>
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 1:03 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:
> Why is inclusion in the test suite being gated on a review process?
> I thought we agreed during the testing discussion at TPAC in
> November that it wouldn't be.
> I think a model where tests are included when their author thinks
> they're ready, and then others can challenge them, works much better
> than one gated on reviews for all tests.

I agree with that, but it doesn't seem to have been the status quo as
of when I joined the Testing TF.  Maybe someone who's been here longer
can clarify the history and rationale.
Received on Sunday, 20 February 2011 18:29:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:14:30 UTC