W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-testsuite@w3.org > February 2011

RE: Automated Test Runner

From: Kris Krueger <krisk@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 02:57:24 +0000
To: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
CC: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, "public-html-testsuite@w3.org" <public-html-testsuite@w3.org>, "Jonas Sicking (jonas@sicking.cc)" <jonas@sicking.cc>
Message-ID: <6E2EDBA33586754AB83E7D6B3C51CD091726EA50@TK5EX14MBXW651.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
To start you should push the attribute tests in Hg rather than your server, this would be a good way to start to get the tests approved.
Also if anyone has feedback on these tests please send feedback to the list.

-----Original Message-----
From: simetrical@gmail.com [mailto:simetrical@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Aryeh Gregor
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2011 10:28 AM
To: L. David Baron
Cc: James Graham; Kris Krueger; Anne van Kesteren; public-html-testsuite@w3.org; Jonas Sicking (jonas@sicking.cc)
Subject: Re: Automated Test Runner

On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 1:03 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:
> Why is inclusion in the test suite being gated on a review process?
> I thought we agreed during the testing discussion at TPAC in November 
> that it wouldn't be.
> I think a model where tests are included when their author thinks 
> they're ready, and then others can challenge them, works much better 
> than one gated on reviews for all tests.

I agree with that, but it doesn't seem to have been the status quo as of when I joined the Testing TF.  Maybe someone who's been here longer can clarify the history and rationale.

Received on Tuesday, 22 February 2011 03:02:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:14:30 UTC