- From: Kris Krueger <krisk@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 01:43:26 +0000
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- CC: "public-html-testsuite@w3.org" <public-html-testsuite@w3.org>
OK - I submitted an interface test for the HTMLAnchorElement See -> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html/raw-file/tip/tests/submission/Microsoft/interface/anchor_href.htm This is quite a simple framework and removes all the old harness code except for the assert functions. One question would be would we rather have all the attributes tested on one page (href, target, rel, etc...) or have one page for each attribute. -Kris RSS Log for the repository is at https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html/rss-log -----Original Message----- From: Anne van Kesteren [mailto:annevk@opera.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 9:06 AM To: James Graham; Kris Krueger Cc: public-html-testsuite@w3.org Subject: Re: Test Case Approval Request On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:43:22 +0200, Kris Krueger <krisk@microsoft.com> wrote: > Thanks for the feedback, good for the group and the approval process. > If I understand your feedback correctly, how about instead of moving the > valid 'a' tag dom tests into the approved folder. Instead I also submit > case(s) for all of the 'a' tag attributes? For example the 'a' tag dom > test would cover the interface listed below from the HTML5 spec. That sounds great. I would again humble suggest we use a somewhat simpler framework than what these tests are made with though. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 20 April 2010 01:44:17 UTC