Re: CfC: Request transition of Media Source Extensions (MSE) to Proposed Recommendation

I support requesting transition to Proposed Recommendation for the
referenced Media Source Extensions (MSE) document.

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 6:25 AM, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
wrote:

> In accordance with the W3C process's requirement to record the group's
> decision to request advancement [1], this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to
> request transition to Proposed Recommendation for the following Media
> Source Extensions (MSE) document:
>
>
>
> https://w3c.github.io/media-source/media-source-pr.html
>
>
>
> For your reference there is list of recent commits to the MSE
> specification:
>
> https://github.com/w3c/media-source/commits/gh-pages/media-
> source-respec.html
>
>
>
> There were 60 V1, V1Editorial and V1NonBlocking issues processed since the
> MSE issues were triaged in March 2016 [2] for the Candidate Recommendation
> specifications [3-5]:
>
> 34 V1 issues: https://github.com/w3c/media-source/milestone/2?closed=1
>
> 25 V1Editorial issues: https://github.com/w3c/media-
> source/milestone/5?closed=1
>
> 1 V1NonBlocking issues: https://github.com/w3c/media-
> source/milestone/4?closed=1
>
>
>
> A list of all issues against MSE is available at:
>
> https://github.com/w3c/media-source/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue
>
> and a list of issues NOT dealt with in this cycle and assigned to the
> VNext milestone is available at:
>
> https://github.com/w3c/media-source/milestone/1
>
>
>
> ISSUE-74 which is tagged as V1Editorial is still outstanding and the MSE
> Registry will be published as a WG Note before we present the Proposed
> Recommendation to the W3C Director.
>
> https://github.com/w3c/media-source/issues/74
>
>
>
> Test results for this specification can be found at [6-8].  An updated
> analysis of the test results is available at [9].  Note that we plan to
> continue updating the MSE test results until we present the draft Proposed
> Recommendation to the W3C Director.
>
>
>
> Silence will be taken to mean there is no objection, but positive
> responses are encouraged. If there are no objections by Friday 16
> September, this resolution will carry.
>
>
>
> Considerations to note:
>
>
>
> - A request to advance indicates that the Working Group believes the
> specification is stable and appropriate for advancement to Recommendation
> status.
>
>
>
> /paulc
>
> HME WG Chair
>
>
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#transition-reqs
>
> [2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/
> 2016Mar/0003.html
>
> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/CR-media-source-20151112/
>
> [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-media-source-20160503/
>
> [5] http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-media-source-20160705/
>
> [6] https://w3c.github.io/test-results/media-source/all.html
>
> [7] https://w3c.github.io/test-results/media-source/less-than-2.html
>
> [8] https://w3c.github.io/test-results/media-source/complete-fails.html
>
> [9] http://tidoust.github.io/media-source-testcoverage/
>
>
>
> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
>
> 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
>
> Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
>
>
>