Arnt Gulbrandsen writes: > Gregory Woodhouse writes: >> Now, that's been tried before (with rich text), without much (if any) >> success. >> [...] > > It's been tried three times before. Two total failures (text/richtext > and text/enriched), one reasonable success (format=flowed). More than "reasonable" success, I now learn. Dave Cridland (a MUA developer) accidentally broke his MUA this week, so that it couldn't display text/plain, only text/plain;format=flowed. He says about three quarters of his human-generated mail remained readable, and most machine-generated mail (bounces etc.) was unreadable. I'm sure other people will find different numbers if they do the same count. But at least for some people, the very restricted format=flowed has had much greater success than unrestricted HTML. ArntReceived on Wednesday, 21 March 2007 17:03:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:12:23 GMT