- From: Gavin Carothers <gavin@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:09:12 -0700
- To: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- Cc: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>, "public-html-data-tf@w3.org" <public-html-data-tf@w3.org>
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote: > Ah! Thanks! That is a bug in my RDFa example. In all GoodRelations examples, we use datatyping, except for xsd:string, because while this is theoretically needed, too, the distinction between plain literals and typed RDF literals with xsd:string as their type is hard to explain to practitioners. The RDF WG has resolved to remove that distinction. "example" == "example"^^xsd:string the current working draft of RDF Concepts talks more about this, http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-Graph-Literal Cheers, Gavin
Received on Tuesday, 18 October 2011 21:09:47 UTC