Re: Mapping Microdata to RDF

>
>
>  <span itemscope><span itemprop="name">Gregg Kellogg</span></span>
>
> (not nested within some other element with an itemtype on it) then it will
> produce the microdata:
>
>    {
>      "properties": {
>        "name": [
>          "Gregg Kellogg"
>        ]
>      }
>    }
>
> So rather than not producing any RDF at all (which is what I think step
> 6.2.1 is saying), I think it should produce:
>
>  [] <#name> "Gregg Kellogg" .
>
> where the base URI (which the #name will be concatenated to) is based on
> the document base URI.


I agree. My (untested) opinion is that this is closer to user expectations
than having no RDF produced for annotated content.

-Lin