W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-commits@w3.org > May 2011

html5/decision-policy decision-policy-v2.html,1.19,1.20

From: Maciej Stachowiak via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 09:32:44 +0000
To: public-html-commits@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QLuAO-0006cb-Bf@lionel-hutz.w3.org>
Update of /sources/public/html5/decision-policy
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv25358

Modified Files:
Log Message:
clarify what materials are considered when chairs look at survey results

Index: decision-policy-v2.html
RCS file: /sources/public/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy-v2.html,v
retrieving revision 1.19
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -d -r1.19 -r1.20
--- decision-policy-v2.html	16 May 2011 09:24:39 -0000	1.19
+++ decision-policy-v2.html	16 May 2011 09:32:42 -0000	1.20
@@ -456,8 +456,13 @@
 <dd>If there are no objections, very few (and weak) objections, or
 objections can be resolved, the chairs declare that the Call for
 Consensus becomes a resolution. The Working Group affirms or overrules
-the editor's decision depending on the outcome. The Basic Process then
-proceeds from <a href="#basic-step-7a">step 7a</a>
+the editor's decision depending on the outcome. When reviewing the
+results of a survey, the Chairs will examine the Change Proposals, the
+survey responses themselves, and any material linked from a survey
+response. The Chairs do not guarantee that any other material, such as
+email to the WG list related to the topic, will be
+considered. Filtering such a volume of material is impractical. The
+Basic Process then proceeds from <a href="#basic-step-7a">step 7a</a>
 or <a href="#basic-step-7b">step 7b</a> as appropriate. <b>** This is
 an endpoint for the escalation process. **</b> </dd>
Received on Monday, 16 May 2011 09:32:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:10:32 UTC