W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-comments@w3.org > April 2013

Re: Feature:Content rating/maturity level tag.

From: dE . <de.techno@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 22:45:31 +0530
Message-ID: <CADofXPAee-RJRoVf9crx=kbTfG07bVTYFW5_U6jWMtd0Dfx-Ag@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-html-comments@w3.org
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote:

> On 15/04/2013 21:10 , dE . wrote:
>
>> How about a new tag (or maybe use an existing tag) which specifies the
>> nature of the content of the page with aspect of the maturity level?
>>
>
> Are you familiar with PICS? There is some information here:
>
>     http://www.w3.org/PICS/
>
> Note that it is rather old, but at some point it did have some momentum (I
> don't believe that's the case any more though).
>
> According to the page PICS has been superseded by POWDER, but I don't get
> the impression that the latter has been very successful to date.
>
> --
> Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
>

Sorry for the super late response.

The reason for their failures should be diagnosed.

POWDER is a separate protocol which has to be implemented on web servers,
so has all kinds of complications.

Then this's not a part of a popular standard.

These maybe the reasons why they're not popular, people don't expect much
from a separate protocols, but HTML is a BIG thing.
Received on Friday, 19 April 2013 17:15:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:26:29 UTC