W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-comments@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Concerns Regarding Microdata CR

From: Gannon Dick <gannon_dick@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:18:17 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <1353968297.6688.YahooMailNeo@web112607.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>, "public-html-comments@w3.org" <public-html-comments@w3.org>
+1, I remain reluctant, after many years to support RDFa in HTML Headers.  It always seemed to me doubling down on opacity.  To blur namespaces in a DOM too ?   Good for the filter feeders but not good for Linked Data and poison for the "fair" exchange of Open Data, I think.

--Gannon




________________________________
 From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
To: public-html-comments@w3.org 
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 1:09 PM
Subject: Concerns Regarding Microdata CR
 

Hi all,

I share Manu Sporny's concerns expressed in [1] regarding the planned promotion of Microdata to CR status in [2].  I do not believe that it would be appropriate for the W3C to standardize both Microdata and RDFa due to significant technical overlap (although it would be fine with me if Microdata were a Note).

This is my personal opinion and not as co-chair of the RDF WG.  However, I reserve the right to ask the RDF WG to express an opinion.


Regards,
Dave
--
http://about.me/david_wood

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Nov/0177.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Nov/0128.html 
Received on Monday, 26 November 2012 22:18:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 26 November 2012 22:18:46 GMT