W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-comments@w3.org > June 2011

Re: Contributions to HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives

From: Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 15:53:33 +0900
To: Reinaldo Ferraz <reinaldo@nic.br>
Cc: public-html-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <20110603065332.GG33695@sideshowbarker>
In response to your comments, I have opened up the following bug reports:

  http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12873
  http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12874
  http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12875
  http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12876
  http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12877

You can add yourself to the CC Lists for those bugs -- which will require
that you create a W3C Bugzilla user account (if you don't have one
already):

  http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/createaccount.cgi

Reinaldo Ferraz <reinaldo@nic.br>, 2011-06-01 16:29 -0300:

> Dear Srs.
> 
> Follow my contributions to the document *HTML5: Techniques for providing
> useful text alternatives*
> 
> Best Regards
> Reinaldo Ferraz
> 
> --------------------------------------------------
> *Examples of scenarios where users benefit from text alternatives for
> images*
> Add:
> - They have problems to load images or the source of image is wrong
> --------------------------------------------------
> 
> Question: In the *Example 2.5*, is it possible to use Image maps <map></map>
> to create alternatives and to put ALT inside of each <area> tag?
> --------------------------------------------------
> 
> Removing the link *Providing a text alternative that is not null. (e.g.,
> alt="spacer" or alt="image") for images that should be ignored by assistive
> technology [WCAG20-TECHS]*. In that way, it would made users confused about
> the meaning (if the user doesnt click on the link)
> 
> In the *Example 6.4*, I consider important a short description to the image.
> It´s important even for a blind person or somebody who cannot load images
> perceive that there is an image with a purpose: create a medieval atmosphere
> to the webpage. I disagree that the image with description is only related
> to the blind or low vision webpage. The link example shows the users
> preference http://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey/#images
> 
> --------------------------------------------------
> 
> I belive that *3.11 A group of images that form a single larger picture with
> and without links* is not necessary. the same situation is been using at the
> examples *Example 1.1* and *Example 1.2*
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Michael[tm] Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike
Received on Friday, 3 June 2011 06:53:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 3 June 2011 06:53:33 GMT