W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-comments@w3.org > December 2011

Re: Follow-up about PUT and DELETE in form methods

From: Cameron Heavon-Jones <cmhjones@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:12:55 +0000
Cc: mike amundsen <mamund@yahoo.com>, Mirko Gustony <mirko.gustony@gmail.com>, thibault <thibault@miximum.fr>, public-html-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <B4680C09-7CD5-4493-AB9E-2491BCEC1AC5@gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>

On 13/12/2011, at 3:24 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> On 2011-12-13 16:16, Cameron Heavon-Jones wrote:
>> 
>> On 13/12/2011, at 3:09 PM, mike amundsen wrote:
>> 
>>> Based on repeated comments about what this issue of what the browser
>>> user-agent *expects* as a return for PUT/DELETE, I wonder if things
>>> would go better if the Prefer header proposal was included in all
>>> this.
>>> 
>>> mca
>>> http://amundsen.com/blog/
>>> http://twitter.com@mamund
>>> http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me
>>> 
>> 
>> Personally i don't agree with "Prefer" header but i stated this previously, as it is optional i just choose not to use it.
>> 
>> If it satisfies concerns i have no problem referencing it as something people can use.
> 
> Well, to make this "work", we'd need to define a Preference token, and mandate that the browser sends it.
> 
> Best regards, Julian

I have no objections to people using a Preference token if they wish, i don't think it requires to be mandatory for UAs.

Thanks,
Cam
Received on Tuesday, 13 December 2011 16:13:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 13 December 2011 16:13:29 GMT