W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-comments@w3.org > January 2008

Re: rel="self", rev="made"

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:36:41 +0100
To: "Frank Ellermann" <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
Cc: public-html-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.t5hu3fco64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:26:34 +0100, Frank Ellermann  
<hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com> wrote:
> Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> Or maybe the problem is with Atom:
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/types.html#type-links
>
> I fear I miss the joke here, that's the old HTML 4
> page listing some relations.

including "bookmark".


>  RFC 4287 introduced a
> IANA registry for relations used with Atom:
>
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations.html

The point is that you asked why HTML 5 introduced "bookmark" which would  
be a synonym for "self" that Atom introduced. However, HTML 5 did not  
introduce "bookmark", HTML 4 did, in 1999.


> Your draft is IMO far too ambitious.  How about a
> "HTML 4.5" step cleaning up HTML 4.01 adding IRIs,
> with a corresponding text/html XHTML 1.0.5 ?

I don't think anyone has plans to work on that.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 25 January 2008 16:33:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 1 June 2011 00:13:58 GMT