[Bug 11984] <video>: Figure out the story with respect to honouring Content-Type headers vs sniffing content

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11984

--- Comment #55 from Adrian Bateman [MSFT] <adrianba@microsoft.com> ---
(In reply to Ian 'Hixie' Hickson from comment #54)
> However, if what you're saying is that you won't change, then let's turn to
> foolip. Is there any change Blink could get fixed to follow the Content-Type
> header and not sniff?

I'm not saying we won't change - we're investigating changing to the lax
approach where we just try to play. I don't have an answer yet - working
through the conversations. If there are no bugs in the sniffing "algorithm"
then this wouldn't be meaningfully different from this approach.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2014 23:06:15 UTC