W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > September 2011

[Bug 14213] missing transitive dependencies - NodeIterator, Range, TreeWalker

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 21:05:16 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1R6Tym-0008QJ-O3@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14213

Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |ian@hixie.ch
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX

--- Comment #3 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-09-21 21:05:16 UTC ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: If we were to explicitly list the transitive closure of all the
dependencies, we'd end up referencing specs like the electrical grid, screws,
motherboard design specs, wifi... That way lies madness.

If a reader wants to follow the references, they can follow them.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 21 September 2011 21:05:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:31:19 UTC