- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 23:22:13 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14213
Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX |
--- Comment #4 from Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> 2011-09-21 23:22:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
> satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
> you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
> reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
> Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
> title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
> yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html
>
> Status: Rejected
> Change Description: no spec change
> Rationale: If we were to explicitly list the transitive closure of all the
> dependencies, we'd end up referencing specs like the electrical grid, screws,
> motherboard design specs, wifi... That way lies madness.
>
> If a reader wants to follow the references, they can follow them.
in that case, please add a general comment in 2.2.2 that indicates the
intention not to list type dependencies that obtain solely from indirect
inclusion via transitive closure
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 21 September 2011 23:22:15 UTC