W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > November 2011

[Bug 11124] consider reducing verbosity when talking about code points

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 18:01:05 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1RSBhR-0004BS-C5@jessica.w3.org>

--- Comment #10 from Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> 2011-11-20 18:01:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Decision:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jul/0213.html
> Change Proposal:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Feb/0120.html

Something went wrong here.

This bug rightly should never have been escalated to an issue to begin with.

Do we really want to be using to micro-manage editorial choices about which
there are a variety of not-particularly-strong opinions and that therefore
amount purely to judgement calls that properly are best left up to editorial
discretion -- and that have no effect either way on actual implementation
conformance criteria?

This change is something that would require a significant amount of manual work
on the part of an editor to change. And to what end? How does this rank as a
priority with other actually important that need to be done?

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 20 November 2011 18:01:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:31:22 UTC