W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > November 2011

[Bug 14884] Proposing a page including system

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:18:10 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1RSA5q-0008Mc-P2@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14884

--- Comment #3 from Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> 2011-11-20 16:18:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> More specifically, why is it not acceptable to use frames, iframes, javascript,
> or server-side includes to solve the use-case?

Frames are deprecated and can not be styled suffiently (AFAIU).

IFrames may be suffient once there's support for @seamless.

Javascript: if this would be a sufficient argument, we could do remove lots of
other stuff as well :-)

Server-side includes have several disadvantages: you need server-side
processing (doen't work for static files), and essentially you create aggregate
resources which can't be as easily maintained/cached as individual resources.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 20 November 2011 16:18:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 20 November 2011 16:18:13 GMT