- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 18:21:57 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14709 --- Comment #9 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> 2011-11-07 18:21:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #6) > > Thus I don't see that you have brought forward a valid reason to not do what > > John D proposed. > > Let me step back a bit. John D. said: If you realie that your talk about subsetting the BCP47 was wrong, then we can at least put that misunderstanding to the side ... :-D > "As is, the spec merely defines the > *expectation* that the language code is a BCP47 code but allows for an > entirely different language tag format to be used in it's place." > > I don't read this from the current spec. That is, I don't read the spec as > permitting "an entirely different language tag format". The spec defines - in principle - how a unknown tag should be handled. But it does not cover the issue that the 'unknown' or 'unreckonized' tag could be recognized/known by some other registry or convention than the BCP 47 one, and that the UA - or API - might know that convention. At least, that is how I read it. I read the screenreader example of the spec as more of an adhoc case. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 7 November 2011 18:22:00 UTC